Dear Blue Lou,
Now of course we have a song like ‘Blue’, with its oh so meaningful words (not). Word is that he wrote this after going to a Mets game when David Wright went 0-5 and made an error in the field.
I read somewhere, not sure now, that someone said that this song is better than E-Bow the Letter being its “Wiser Cousin”. Oh please, give me a break regarding how much corporate dick these reviewers are sucking. Does R.E.M. hand out lipstick in their Press Kits?
I think R.E.M. has become the Eagles.
This is a combination of Country Feedback and E-Bow gone horribly wrong and the ending with Discoverer just solidifies this as a mess. It works as a B-Side minus the Discoverer ending but I do not give them kudus for basically doing the same thing over again 15 years after you mastered it the first time. Who gives a fuck if it didn’t become the #1 hit single you expected? It was a beautiful song, and still the best thing off of Hi-Fi no doubt.
And this bastard cousin had to come around and urinate all over it. Patti is reprising her role on this for whatever reason why, doing her interpretive thing to add some “Art” where necessary my only question would be Where is KRS-1 for their Rap Song about Stipe’s internet Radio station on Last FM and how he is getting sick of it always playing Coldplay and Dashboard Confessional Songs?
So there we have it. An opportunity to go through every song on Collapse into Now. Next will be the long awaited official review however, as you can tell already I doubt you are going to see any 4 star rating from me.
Comments
CIN
My 2 cents:
The NY Times review in today’s paper is not very complimentary to put it mildly: eg, [the band] seems to want to tread water; feels undernourished; just banal; do[es] a fair job of revisiting the early-mid years; feels accidental [??]; flavorless drumming, the gratuitously loud and busy textures, the meat-and-potatoes chord changes in songs; Michael Stipe has written some pretty poor lyrics here.” And it goes on.
I must say that although I tend to take the Times’ music reviews of popular music with a grain of salt, I do think that some of its comments are on target.
Entertainment Weekly gives the album a B, and condenses their review to a very short paragraph, leaving Avril Lavigne to a full page but a grade of B-. So much for relevancy of the band. Perhaps in hindsight, the band should have closed shop after Bill left, leaving us with wonderful memories and few, if any, shutters.
While I’m finding that some fans of the band tend to be unduly negative toward the album, I do think that those of us who have grown up with and love the band, and after the pabulum of the last four albums, do tend to cling to anything that’s even ever-so-slightly reminiscent of REM as a foursome. At least, I do. Consequently, much of this album I do like, and I think a B or 4 of 5 stars is about right. Having said that, if I were measuring it against any of their albums though Hi-Fi, I’d put it last.
And so it goes . . .
Gary
re: CIN
I think the Pitchfork review is the one that matters. Whether you agree with them or not, they can make or break an album and if it were to get "Best New Music" tag, it would be obviously be huge and anything over 7 they should be satisfied with.
My guess is 6.6